
Social Media Analysis: Gov. Bill Richardson (D)
Gov. Bill Richardson has the following:
- Website: http://richardsonforpresident.com/
- YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/BillRichardson
- MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/richardsonforpresident
- Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/billrichardson
- Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/richardson_06
- PartyBuilder: http://www.democrats.org/page/dashboard/public/gFKNL
- Blog: http://action.richardsonforpresident.com/page/community/group/Headquarters
Website: The Richardson site has a splash page, but at least after you go there once, they redirect you to the main site so you don’t have to see it again (grin). So here a site that is pretty much the same as everyone else’s – red, white and blue, big imagery with messaging right up front, the required “action center” on the left and the YouTube video on the right. With Iowa a mere two days away there is a great deal of focus on the caucus – and getting people there. At the same time, this site is easy to navigate, easy to read and is much like the candidate himself – direct, clear and to the point – even though it is a bit overwhelming from the “call to action” stand point. News items (with RSS feeds!), register to vote, ask the candidate a question, upcoming events and blog information as well as the campaign store are all available in little blocks all over the home page. Focusing on the top navigation keeps it simple, and a quick scroll through the home page hits the highlights. This is also a site that has “en espanol” which is actually pretty good, although even I can tell it hasn’t been updated as much as the English. The social media sites listed on the home page include: YouTube, Flickr, MySpace, Facebook and Party builder. This is all the way down at the bottom, so it is clear that this campaign wants to keep people engaged in their action center. Keep that control – note to the campaign staffers, run a search for the visibility of your candidate and tell me if those action centers are doing the job you want them to do online? Again, is it enough to get people in there … or do you want to set them free to create and spread the word for you so that you increase your online visibility? So far only one candidate is doing that (and you know who he is!).
The Richardson action center is ho-hum. Signing up is easy and it was simple to find people in Vermont who support him and the different groups. Not a lot of activity here – again, what’s the value for me to be involved there when I can be involved in Facebook or MySpace? Or…for many, what’s the point anyway? What do I get? It is, after all, about value, and I still don’t see any of the campaigns providing that in a big way. The action center is a constant throughout the site on every page of information.
There is a blog (more on that below) where postings for from campaign staff include email memos and even messages from the candidate – again, doesn’t look like the candidate himself is blogging.
The media center provides the basics from news releases to high res photos.
This candidate is also segmenting his audience but not as aggressively as Obama did. There are four state headquarters (Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and S. Carolina) as well as women, Native Americans, a Spanish group, veterans and sportsmen categories. While there are slightly different images, they all have the same look and feel to tie them together.
Within the multimedia section the campaign is porting in YouTube video of various types from CNN pulls to caucus-goers.
YouTube: Same as all the others – video that includes ad campaigns, news footage and campaign staffers. Fairly up to date, although not showing the most recent on the main YouTube group page. One of the downfalls to the Action Center thing is that the campaign is not encouraging people strongly enough to go to sites like YouTube and post commentary. The commentary – given the nature of it – can be quite disappointing, but with supporters rallying in “public” spaces like these, more could happen. (Actually, all candidates should do this). Anyway, YouTube for this candidate has 1,715 subscribers.
MySpace: Not much to this MySpace – general information, some videos, and the “add this to your page” banners. It has been updated as of yesterday though! But…overall…Yawn. 20,577 friends.
Facebook: Video, same information and with the new Facebook option for “politicians” it looks pretty good but nothing super engaging. It has been updated recently with new video posted. However, there is little to know discussion or activity overall. No big push on a group either. 7,678 supporters
Flickr: Great photos. The generic profile. Nothing more. Missing an opportunity to port these photos to the main campaign website and to beef up the Flickr so it has more information – such as testimonials!
PartyBuilder: Um, you already know how I feel about this one. Ugh. Other than to be a part of the Democratic Party … there is NO point to this one. Yuck. Clearly the campaign is not too engaged on this one there is only the basic information. Good call on their part. I don’t even think it is worth listing this on the main campaign website.
Search Results: Richardson is, again, a fairly common name and the candidate pulls first and second in rankings at Google on a search for “Richardson”. The WikiPedia.com entry comes at five, between the city of Richardson and a sales training site. MySpace doesn’t show up until the second page of listings. However, a search on the Candidate’s full name (Bill Richardson) reveals top listings for the candidate site, WikiPedia.com and the governor site along with YouTube, MySpace and the candidates “action center”. No CPC campaign being run – either by the candidate or by others. Over at Yahoo!, the last name only search gets the auto-fill in from the search engine of “Bill Richardson” as first choice, so that is good. Results show that the city of Richardson beats out the Gov, whose campaign site comes in second, with the WikiPedia.com at number four, and MySpace at five. Searching on the full name however provides a true WTF moment: first result is for http://billrichardsonforpresident.com – the EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE site. Click on it and you get a Network Solutions “under construction” page. Um…ok folks…this one is easy and takes like THREE SECONDS. Put a REDIRECT to the main campaign site on this, especially if it is NUMBER ONE in the rankings (gee whiz!). Even more baffling is the “Blog” that comes up at fifth ranking – last post as of JULY! The actual campaign site doesn’t come up until the 8th listing, followed by another page from the main candidate site and then the MySpace. A lot of CPC going on here, but nothing for the candidate or for the competition. Pretty low key actually. Finally, over at Live, a search on Richardson finds the candidate site at fourth place, and second under “related searches”. Searching on the full name provides a full listing similar to Google results – candidate site, governor site, WikiPedia.com, news items, the action center and oh…there’s that “under construction” site again! There is some CPC going on here…an un-related third party has a sponsored ad for the candidate, and while it goes to what looks like a “pro bill Richardson site” there is a link to a blog that is pretty random. Nothing focused here at all.
Bottom line, there are some good search results here on both just last name and full name. The bad news is the candidate has this expired URL out there that isn’t re-directing. Given the fact that Yahoo! is the SECOND largest search property to have that expired URL out there at number one on search is highly detrimental. Hope the campaign fixes that ASAP!
Blog: The Richardson campaign blog is wrapped into the “Action Center” and is a series of posts highlighting memos, emails sent to supporters and general information from a group of individuals. Nothing here from the candidate. While the “action center” is getting some rankings in the search engines, the blog itself is not. That’s the risk in keeping things deep in a site. At least this one allows for comments.
Recommendations: Overall this campaign is not outstanding in their social media and website. It’s pretty much the same as many of the others. While there is good information here, there isn’t a lot of leverage going on – I think that given the standing of this candidate at this time, more should be done on the social media side to fully push the momentum they want to show off. As I’ve written before, if you don’t get coverage by the media, a candidate must take things into their own hands. The perception is the reality and if people don’t keep seeing you…then you disappear. This campaign should be looking at CPC and Banner Ads (not seeing a big push on banner ads online…hmmm…I wonder why?) on major sites around the country. They should be leveraging their social media and getting their supporters to POST and WRITE things in the spaces such as YouTube, MySpace and Facebook. And finally…get that URL redirect updated for the exploratory site so it redirects to the campaign site. Who knows what opportunities have been missed because of that one!
The campaign is being judicious, however. Note that they aren’t jumping on EVERY social media bandwagon that comes along – they are focusing on the big players which allow them to keep things fairly up to date, even if the sites themselves are “meh”.
Bottom Line: Do more with what you have, get your supporters to post and use your resources to strike out on a different type of ad campaign. Get your message out there!